EvenUp vs Supio vs Eve: AI for Personal Injury Firms (2026)

EvenUp, Supio and Eve are the three AI platforms personal injury firms shortlist most often, and all three turn medical records into chronologies and demand letters. Pick EvenUp if demands are your bottleneck and you want the option of its own legal team finishing the work. Pick Supio if you want one agent across the whole firm, mass torts support and the widest set of integrations. Pick Eve if you also handle employment, workers' compensation or disability cases, or want AI to answer intake calls around the clock.

This guide is for partners, firm administrators and operations leads at plaintiff firms. It is not legal advice, and none of the three vendors publishes prices, so the numbers that matter will come from your own demos.

Key takeaways

• None of the three lists prices. EvenUp describes "case-based pricing". Supio and Eve quote after a demo. Budget time for three sales calls.
• EvenUp is the demand specialist. Its "AI + Professional Review" tier has demands drafted by AI and finished by its team of 150+ legal professionals, delivered in 1 to 5 days.
• Supio is built as a firm-wide agent. Beyond case work it offers dashboards, cross-case pattern recognition, performance benchmarking and mass torts discovery.
• Eve covers the most practice areas. Personal injury, labor and employment, workers' compensation, Social Security disability and medical malpractice, plus a 24/7 intake voice agent.
• Security paperwork differs. EvenUp and Supio state SOC 2 Type 2 and HIPAA on their sites. Eve links a trust portal, DPA and SLA, but we did not find a SOC 2 or HIPAA statement on the pages we read.

How do EvenUp, Supio and Eve compare?

All details as of November 2026, from each vendor's own website. Customer counts and outcome figures below are vendor claims.

EvenUp: for firms whose bottleneck is demands

EvenUp calls itself a proactive AI platform for personal injury law firms. Its product now spans the case lifecycle, from intake and treatment through demands, negotiation, discovery and trial, but demands are still its core.

What stands out is the choice of service level. Demands come in two tiers:

• AI + You: drafted by EvenUp's own model, Piai, in minutes. EvenUp says this suits teams with in-house drafting capacity.
• AI + Professional Review: drafted by AI and then reviewed by EvenUp's team of 150+ legal professionals, delivered finished in 1 to 5 days. This is closer to outsourcing than to software.

Medical chronologies (MedChrons) work the same way: an AI-only version in minutes, or one reviewed by EvenUp staff with optional nurse review. EvenUp also offers what it calls Pre-Litigation as a Service and a settlement repository for negotiation prep.

On integrations, EvenUp names Litify, SmartAdvocate and CASEpeer, plus SharePoint, Google Drive and Dropbox, and says insights push back into your case management system. It says most firms are connected within a few hours. Clio and Filevine are not named on its integrations page.

Security: EvenUp's trust center describes a SOC 2 Type 2 examination and a HIPAA assessment, U.S. data centers, encryption in transit and at rest and annual penetration tests. It also says case data is used to improve its product and that third-party AI providers, including OpenAI and Anthropic, may not train on case files. Read that clause carefully if your engagement letters limit how client data is used.

EvenUp says it works with 2,000+ U.S. personal injury firms and has raised $385M. Pricing is "case-based", and the trust center refers to credits and usage-based overages, so ask how a case is counted and what happens when volume spikes.

Supio: for firms that want one agent across every case

Supio describes itself as an agentic legal AI platform for plaintiff law and mass torts. Its flagship is the Supio Agent, which works at two levels.

At case level it covers intake, medical chronologies, demand letters, an instant case ledger, missing records, interrogatory responses, litigation drafting and deposition prep. At firm level it offers task prioritization, case dashboards, cross-case pattern recognition, mass torts discovery, performance benchmarking and case financial analysis. Your firm's templates and style are stored as "skills", and past demands and settlements become the agent's memory.

Human review is built in rather than sold as a separate tier: Supio says human experts verify every medical chronology, and for high-value cases they check medical bill totals and damage calculations. Demand letters map injuries to ICD-10 codes, link every claim to its source, and come with unlimited edits at no extra cost.

Supio has the longest integration list of the three. Case management: Litify and SmartAdvocate (both two-way), MyCase, CASEpeer, Smokeball, Jove and Neostella. Documents: Dropbox, OneDrive, SharePoint, Box, ShareFile and Google Drive. It also connects to Westlaw, Outlook, Zoom, RingCentral, Dialpad and QuickBooks, and offers a REST API and webhooks to any customer.

On security, Supio states SOC 2 Type II certification with continuous monitoring through Vanta, HIPAA, PHIPA and GDPR controls, and data centers in the U.S., UK and Canada with data kept in your country. It says it does not pool customer data into shared training models. Supio says 500+ plaintiff firms use it. There is no public price; demos run on your own cases.

Eve: for plaintiff firms with more than one practice area

Eve sells EveOS, "the AI operating layer for plaintiff lawyers". It is the only one of the three that clearly targets labor and employment, workers' compensation, Social Security disability and medical malpractice alongside personal injury.

Its intake module is the most distinctive feature here: an AI voice agent answers calls 24/7 in 28+ languages, scores leads with a stated reason, and can send a retainer for signature during the call. Eve says the agent identifies itself as an AI at the start of every call, which you should confirm meets your state bar's rules on client communications.

Medical overviews include a case summary, a visit timeline, ICD codes, economic damages with missing bills flagged, and a "bad facts" section covering prior injuries and similar issues. Eve says a run takes 15 to 45 minutes depending on volume and exports to Word or CSV. Demand letters are trained on your firm's completed demands, with separate agents for auto, premises, dog bite, employment, workers' compensation and medical malpractice or wrongful death cases. Eve also drafts complaints, propounds and responds to discovery, and runs case law research with citations. An Auditor module reviews every matter nightly to flag treatment gaps.

Eve names Clio Grow, SmartAdvocate and Litify as CRM and case management integrations, plus RingCentral, Zoom Phone and Dialpad, and offers open APIs and custom MCP connections. That makes it the only one of the three that names a Clio product, which matters if your firm runs on Clio.

We did not find a SOC 2 or HIPAA statement on the Eve pages we read. The site links a trust portal with a subprocessor list, a DPA, an SLA and enterprise terms, so request those documents and a business associate agreement before you upload medical records. Eve's customer count also varies across its pages, from 1,200+ to 1,700+ firms. There is no public price; Eve offers demos and a pilot.

How should a personal injury firm choose?

1. Name the bottleneck. If demands pile up, start with EvenUp and Supio. If missed calls and slow intake cost you cases, start with Eve. If leadership wants firm-wide numbers, look hardest at Supio.
2. Decide how much human review you want to buy. EvenUp sells finished, professionally reviewed demands as a tier. Supio includes expert verification of chronologies. Eve is closer to software your own team drives.
3. Check your case management system first. Ask each vendor for a live demo of the integration with your system, not a logo on a slide. Two-way sync matters more than a list.
4. Run the same three closed cases through each. Use cases where you know the outcome. Compare chronology accuracy, missed bills and how much editing each demand needs.
5. Get pricing in writing per case. All three quote privately. Ask what counts as a case, what reviews cost, and how overages work.
6. Ask for the paperwork. SOC 2 report, HIPAA business associate agreement, data retention terms and whether your data trains any model. Our AI vendor security checklist lists the questions, and our free AI acceptable use policy template helps you set rules for staff once a tool is in.

If you also need general legal research or contract tools, our CoCounsel alternatives for small law firms and legal AI tools comparison cover Harvey, Legora, Spellbook, Paxton and others. For the full field, see the best AI tools for lawyers and legal teams, browse the legal category or compare EvenUp alternatives. This week's most talked about tools are in the rankings.

Bottom line

EvenUp is the safest pick for a personal injury firm that mainly wants more and better demands, especially if it wants to hand finished drafts to an outside team. Supio suits larger plaintiff and mass torts firms that want one agent across every case plus firm-level analytics and broad integrations. Eve is the best fit for multi-practice plaintiff firms and for firms that want AI handling intake calls, provided its security documents check out. Because none of them publishes prices, test all three on the same closed cases before you commit.